Adolescent Cancer Survivors and Their Parents' Experiences With the Transition Off Treatment to Survivorship: A Qualitative Interview Study.

Background: Transitioning from active cancer treatment to survivorship represents a vulnerable yet underresearched phase for adolescents and their families. Knowledge of their support needs, the challenges they experience, and how they manage them are useful to inform tailored follow-up care. Thus, we aimed to explore their transition experiences. Method: We interviewed 15 adolescents (12-19 years) who had transitioned off of treatment 1 to 47 months prior at Oslo University Hospital's Department of Paediatric Haematology and Oncology and their biological parents (n = 16). The interviews were analyzed using inductive, reflexive thematic analysis inspired by Braun and Clarke. NVivo-12 was used for data management. Results: Four main themes were identified: (a) consequences of cancer beyond transition, (b) transition back to normalcy, (c) survivorship competence, and (d) changes in roles and relationships. The families described happiness and relief but also said that the lingering effects of cancer treatment had a profound impact on day-to-day living. The adolescents expressed closeness with and dependency on their parents, and they perceived family and friends as essential for social readjustment. Discussion: Although adolescent survivors and their parents described a wide variety of strategies for returning to "normalcy," their perspectives also illustrate ongoing psychosocial and educational support needs that changed over time. Our findings indicate a need for improved preparation for and support through the transition. Nurses are well positioned to provide continuous and structured transition support tailored to the needs of the individual survivors and their families.

"The post-it note just said leukemia" - Information exchange challenges of teachers and local stakeholders supporting young childhood cancer survivors at school - A qualitative study from the Physical Activity and Fitness in Childhood Cancer Survivors (PACCS) group.

PURPOSE: Explore teachers', school nurses', cancer coordinators' and other local stakeholders' experiences providing education and support for young childhood cancer survivors in the years after treatment. METHODS: We conducted four focus groups and three individual telephone interviews with 15 teachers, nine nurses and three other stakeholders, using inductive thematic analysis inspired by Braun & Clark. Nvivo v12 was used for data-management. RESULTS: Three main themes were developed; "Perceived parent attitudes and facilitation", "The missing link - lack of communication and collaboration", and "Enabling mastery, inclusion and thriving". Parents were perceived to be the sole managers of providing cancer information and school-related follow-up needs. Teachers and other stakeholders experienced the nonexistence of information from specialist healthcare services and poor communication within the municipality. Teachers went to great lengths to meet survivors' pedagogical needs and facilitate peer interactions. Teachers voiced a need for more cancer and late effect knowledge, not being dependent solely on parents' for information. CONCLUSIONS: Teachers and other stakeholders have essential roles in the continuing school experience for survivors. A more regulated teamwork between the stakeholders in the municipalities and the specialist healthcare system could ensure tailored late effect information at school. Implementing formal support could enable a co-creation of a personalized follow up that could relieve the burden on survivors, parents and teachers.

Available, but not always accessible: A nationwide, qualitative study of multidisciplinary healthcare providers' experiences with follow-up care after paediatric brain tumour.

OBJECTIVE: Paediatric brain tumour (PBT) survivors face high risks of disabling long-term and late effects. Whether survivors' needs are met in a system with publicly funded services, but in the absence of a formal long-term follow-up model, is uncertain. Empirically based recommendations for a national model are needed. We explored multidisciplinary healthcare providers' (HCP) experiences with providing such care. METHODS: We conducted five focus-group interviews and five individual interviews with a nationally representative sample of 33 Norwegian HCPs. Focus-group interviews and individual interviews were analysed using systematic text condensation. RESULTS: Three main themes were identified: (a) 'Providing care above and beyond system constraints', describing a perceived discrepancy between HCPs' knowledge of, and their ability to meet, the survivors' needs. (b) 'System barriers to providing optimal follow-up care', describing a perceived lack of routines for communication and coordination between the HCPs and existing care services. (c) 'Nurses and shared-care to improve care', including empowering nurses and establishing routines for collaborations and areas of responsibilities. CONCLUSION: The current healthcare system was perceived not to fully meet the survivors' needs. Nurse-led care models, including standardised patient-care pathways, were suggested to increase the accessibility of already-existing services and thus to improve long-term follow-up care.